Thank you.
Surprisingly, that was my next point.
I had visions of a PIPEDA review too, as we heard your presentation this morning. We're back into similar points of discussion around PIPEDA being the driving mechanism by which we can require compliance and a certain set of practices on the part of businesses and organizations. You made the point very clearly that businesses have a role to play in this.
But the Office of the Privacy Commissioner, the Privacy Commissioner herself, clearly lands on the side of believing that the order-making powers are not as necessary and the ombudsman model, if you will, is working effectively. She points to the increase in consumer education around privacy issues. In fact, in one of your points, which I think was point number two, you suggested a lead agency on these matters, as it relates to identity theft.
I would come back to this. Why is it that you take such a separate view from the Privacy Commissioner on these issues? Wouldn't the Privacy Commissioner be the appropriate agency to do exactly that?