Yes, Mr. Chair.
As our discussion has continued along here, it has become increasingly clear.... In fact, we have the revelation that the subcommittee did have legal counsel available to it. Of course, that legal counsel has not been available to this committee. I realize and perfectly accept that my proposed subamendment to the amendment currently before us did not succeed. But the fact of the matter is, Mr. Chair, that it has now come to light that there was legal counsel involved in shaping the report and the motion before us.
Mr. Chair, that's one of the reasons I certainly support the amendment to the report, so that we can have a proper order. I would say again—and it's really a question to you, sir, and this is perhaps a point of procedure—that should we get through this, for example, and should the report then be put before the committee, there will be a decision taken. Once it's taken, are the deliberations of the subcommittee, which I understand were in camera, then made available to us? I'm thinking that in terms of the context of those arguments that the subcommittee must have considered, it would really be very helpful that we have that information available to us for the course of this study. Is that something...?