Well, it depends on the direction that they've received. In circumstances in which an issue is big enough and sensitive enough, teams are often formed, and there's an agreement amongst the teams as to what constitutes something to be withheld and what does not. So in other words, the sections of the act get reinterpreted for application at that time and place by those people. Those teams can either be overly officious, if you will, or they can be very much wanting people to see this, wanting this to have absolutely maximum openness and transparency.
But those teams are not built from the bottom. Those teams are given their marching orders from higher up the food chain, if you follow what I'm saying. You can see from the sheer volume that the patterns and the identification of a whole bunch of requests coming in, say, to National Defence about detainees will need to be dealt with in a concerted way. The concerting happens at a higher level--and perhaps with it, directions on what is to be held and what is not. I don't know.