I do not think any of the various heads of subsection 15(1) apply to the withholdings in this document. I think that in resorting to subsection 15 (1), no matter which paragraph is relied upon—and as I mentioned earlier, DFAIT has never been precise about that—absolutely none of the text within subsection 15(1) could be relied on legally. I think their resorting to it has been illegal.
It is relevant that the document is marked “Confidential–CEO”. Here, “CEO” means “Canadian eyes only”. This document was intended for Canadian eyes only. As such, it isn't any material that would have been provided by another government, such as that of Afghanistan, and that we would be obliged, out of diplomatic undertaking, not to disclose to our own citizens. This is something—