I think we do produce human rights reports. This is an example of one, this “Afghanistan 2006: Good Governance, Democratic Development and Human Rights”.
If what you're asking is whether we produce a report that draws together all countries between two covers, we don't, but that's hardly necessary. What is necessary is timely, accurate information about human rights, whether it's between two covers or not.
In the United States, the U.S. State Department does produce annual human rights reports for most countries, if not all, and those are freely available on its website. In fact, the U.S. State Department report reads quite similarly to the Canadian one on Afghanistan. I don't mean to be flippant, but if you were looking into other offences that might have taken place, plagiarism might be one.
It's very clear that the Canadian report is patterned on the U.S. version. Nothing is wrong with that, despite my joke; it's actually perfectly appropriate. If the U.S. version represents accurate observations of torture, why shouldn't the Canadian version? It is a sign of the Department of Foreign Affairs' head-in-sand mentality on torture and other human rights abuses that the reports the U.S. puts freely on the website are the ones our bureaucrats keep secret.
I can add one other thing to that--