I agree with Mr. Esau. I cannot say what actual motivations are. I cannot crawl into somebody's head and say, oh, that was the motivation they had at the moment they didn't act. I can give possible, hypothetical motivations.
One that has not been discussed, which I think you need to consider, is that of two of my colleagues, Professor Michael Byers and Professor Bill Schabas. They have expressed the opinion that Canada's transferring detainees when it was known that they would possibly be tortured is highly suggestive of war crimes, and those would be war crimes committed by Canadians. It is a war crime even if you're not the torturer, according to Professor Byers and Professor Schabas. It's a war crime if you're aiding and abetting the torture, i.e., by transferring.
It is possible that some information is being withheld because it is now understood that the consequences of the transfers, perhaps, are very much more troubling than was the case when the transfers initially started. The piece of evidence that--