You're absolutely correct. I was simply pointing out that the committee is going to be seized momentarily of the censored report, and I'm not really wanting to hear debate about an alleged redacted report at this point. The motion didn't talk about multiple reports; it talked about the internal report of the Department of Foreign Affairs, which we're going to get.
If the committee decides to go off on other angles after we've seen that report, or if the committee decides that it wants to see the full report, we can deal with that at that point. I'm just trying to bring some relevance to Mr. Reid's comments, so that I can make sure he stays on the topic of his amendment.