Whatever that document you're referring to may be, I as your chair do not have it. I have not seen it. I don't believe the clerk has it. If individual members want to provide things to other members, they can do so.
Obviously if something came to the chair that was in order and in both official languages, I would as a matter of course instruct that it be distributed. I don't know what you're talking about; I haven't seen it.
Okay. Do we understand?
The subamendment would essentially—and I don't want to waste time by repeating it—allow us to hear from the witnesses who are here today, while continuing to provide structure to the types of witnesses we hear in the future and the order in which we hear them.
All those in favour of the subamendment.... Is there debate?
Mr. Reid.
Excuse me. Madame Lavallée.