Does anyone really want to speak any more to this, or can I call the question?
Let's make sure we understand exactly what the subamendment by Mr. Stanton says. It proposes to switch the order of calling the witnesses, so that the witnesses would be heard in the following order: Jeff Esau and Professor Amir Attaran now, followed by Mr. Paul Koring of The Globe and Mail, followed by the Information Commissioner “and such other witnesses” etc., followed by Jocelyne Sabourin, followed by “such other witnesses as the committee, as a whole”, etc.
Am I stating that correctly, Mr. Stanton?