I'm going to answer it this way. We're debating the fourth report. There's no mention of the redacted version in the fourth report. There's no mention of the redacted version in the amendment, so I'd like you not to refer to it anymore.
From the procedural point of view, there may or may not be an opportunity for us to get the redacted version. That is not part of this debate, and it would obviously form part of decisions that we may take in the future, once we've heard evidence from other people. Then the committee would decide what, if anything, it would want to do to try to get the pure version, if I can put it that way, of the report.
There are varying legal opinions as to what the committee can get and how they can get them, but that's not the subject matter of this report, nor the amendment.
Do you have any further relevant comments to the amendment?