First of all, as Mr. Bergen has pointed out, if the person hasn't registered and somebody is paying them, then there is a big problem there. That's covered in the act.
The code of conduct applies to people who should have registered, even if they didn't. That's my interpretation of it. The way I'm running the shop is that if someone should have registered and they didn't, that doesn't excuse them from the code of conduct, because that's what the act says. That doesn't get them out of it.
Once again, one always needs to look at the facts, and I know you appreciate that. If someone showed, for example, that a lobbyist was exercising—and this is a pretty high bar—improper influence, or causing someone to act some way perhaps because of information they had, or using some kind of very heavy persuasion because of their previous employment, then that would certainly be worth looking into, because that person would not be dealing professionally. They might be using improper influence. It's very difficult to get to the bottom of these things. At the administrative review, we do our investigation by triangulating. We talk to the lobbyist, we talk to the client, and we talk to the public office holder. It's the only way to really get at the truth in these situations.
I'm sorry if that's an oblique response.