Just to be clear, and to make sure that this is not an accountability issue, because I did inherit that interpretation bulletin--it's been around for quite some time--but I also didn't get rid of it, so this is my baby, I know there are others who have adopted it. So if it's a bad idea, it has proliferated because some of the other jurisdictions in Canada that have the word “significant” have also adopted the 20%.
I'll just look to my colleagues to see if there are any other jurisdictions that we're aware of where this idea has migrated. I mean outside of Canada.