And still aren't.
The question that I asked the ATIP officer who was here at the last meeting was on which section they followed. The answer was--and I have it in the blues--that they generally follow subsection 15(1) and that the list that is in the act, which I had read out and discussed, isn't completely exhaustive but is more a guideline, particularly subsection 15(1), in terms of international relations and so on.
Is that your interpretation of the act also, that those are guidelines in the sense that it's not an exhaustive list of exactly what could require that decision? I'm not asking you about this specific case, but about what has happened in the past.