Well, subsection 15(1), as I said earlier, is a discretionary exemption and it's subject to an injury test. Once you get into an injury test, you're getting into a more ambiguous situation in terms of evaluating that injury test. It's not just because the word “terror” happens to be in a report that it automatically gets invoked. If the use of the word “terror” or “torture” in that context potentially has real injury potential, then it can be invoked.
On May 31st, 2007. See this statement in context.