I'm advised that we haven't had such a case recently before the courts. But there is a similar case in the annual report--it's similar because no case is the same. It's case nine, which is the CSIS and Maher Arar matter, where they used subsection 15(1).
We went in, reviewed thousands upon thousands of pages of documents, and ended up resolving the complaint. We accepted that some of the exclusions and exemptions were acceptable, rational, and in compliance with the act, and others were not. CSIS complied.
So the requester may not get 100% satisfaction if he had only 50% when he complained. He might get 75% or 80%. The trend in the office is that he usually gets more if he complains.