Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I have more of a comment than anything. I'm just picking up on Mr. Dewar's line of questioning in regard to quality as a measurement, not just the kinds of indications we've seen here.
I'm reminded as I look through the annual report from the commissioner to the 2006-07 report...I notice here there are about 31 complaints that the commissioner found to have merit out of the 500-some-odd requests that DFAIT actually received. That seems to be about a 6%, or put better, a 94% batting average, when you consider from a quality point of view that it's actually the requester who is ultimately the judge of whether the department has satisfied their request vis-à-vis that information. I think 94% is pretty good, but I think as we go forward, looking at the quality side, it really is the requester who makes that determination.
Thank you, Mr. Chair.