Mr. Chair, if I can just add a few things, I think what Madame Sabourin was mentioning was that in the existing format these guidelines and policy--if you notice at the bottom, it's 1993--are updated regularly in what we call implementation reports. If there's a new issue that comes up or a new guideline that needs to be issued, that is done independently of this. The ATIP community would have access to those implementation reports or notices, as Mr. Alexander mentioned. In the context of policy suite renewal, we are trying to take a rigid format for the policy, directives, and standards, and the guidelines will follow as well.
Specifically on the court decisions, I should say that Mr. Kratchanov's group attends bimonthly community meetings. If case law comes up, there's a section where it's updated. We update a certain area in terms of the access to information practice for ATIP coordinators, and they are advised or given a summary of that court case.
The ATIP community does have access to that. Can it be presented in a better way? I think the answer is yes. That's acknowledged.