When we say we're not obligated to assist, in this particular case, when we look at reports prior to 2006 and in 2006, to me it seems that it's a clear case of concealment.
Would you explain how this paragraph 67(1)(c) will come into effect?
On June 5th, 2007. See this statement in context.
Liberal
Sukh Dhaliwal Liberal Newton—North Delta, BC
When we say we're not obligated to assist, in this particular case, when we look at reports prior to 2006 and in 2006, to me it seems that it's a clear case of concealment.
Would you explain how this paragraph 67(1)(c) will come into effect?
See context to find out what was said next.