Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I take Mr. Dewar's comments to heart. The only thing is the fifth report doesn't say anything about again asking the minister. This is really a secondary tactic based on the fact that there has not yet been the ability to get the minister scheduled. I'm reminded that the minister did indicate that he wouldn't be able to meet this committee until the fall. The fall is going to be reasonably quickly upon us. We were talking here today about perhaps one or maybe two meetings before the fall.
What I see is in fact, as the minister has stated, a willingness to come before this committee in the fall when we resume our committee work in mid-September, presumably. I don't disagree with the sense that the committee should probably consider elevating the pressure. But to Mr. Tilson's point, it's awfully obstructive as well, and I wouldn't want to resort to that tactic until such time as we in fact can't get the minister before us, and I see that there's a willingness by the minister to come.
If we could amend the report—I don't know if that's technically possible—