For the last part of my question, I really think it's necessary that we remove this cloud of doubt. I think the proceedings have produced that, to the effect that, possibly, some of the ATI people....
I guess I want to ask this. In the ATI circles, when ATI people are taken before committee, dragged before committees and really grilled, how does this get out to other staff? Would it actually slow down ATI requests as a result? Would it put a fear into your people? Is it working counter-productively?
I'm not suggesting that we shouldn't be investigating. When there's wrongdoing, we need to get to the bottom of that. But in a particular case like this, what's happening within the ATI? Would people who might possibly be interested in that career look at this and say, “Forget that, I don't need to have this kind of...”?