Thank you.
Ms. Kutz, I'm sure you can tell our confusion around 2002, 2003, 2004, and then the last two. I think we're still trying to get our heads around it. It seems to us that something has obviously changed in those two different timeframes. You were saying that you have done an injury test on all of them to stay consistent with all of that, but I'm trying to understand, then, what changed in world affairs between, let's say, 2004 and 2006. If the injury test that you have applied is the same, why was it appropriate to not release some of the things in 2006 that were released in 2004, specifically things like torture? If the consistency test remained the same and was consistent, what has changed in the world in international affairs?