The officers review the text looking at the redactions that are allowable under the ATIP law that would apply to the Department of Foreign Affairs.
As we look at the document, some of the considerations we look at in terms of things that would be injurious to the capacity of Foreign Affairs to carry out its functions or would be harmful to the integrity of the diplomatic process are questions as to whether release of that information would bring danger to an individual, whether the release of that information would harm our capacity to continue to interact with the government in reference, whether the release of that information would be contrary to a confidential agreement with another government to protect information that is provided in confidence, or whether the release of information would apply to information that would be deemed to be privileged in nature by the person providing it. The release of information under all of those kinds of situations—and those are not exhaustive—would hamper the diplomatic service's capacity to continue to collect information from a wide variety of sources. Sometimes they are within the government in the country where the embassy is. Sometimes they are members of other foreign governments that are in that country. Sometimes they are individuals associated with international organizations operating in that country. Sometimes they are private citizens who typically are at greatest risk should the information be released.
Does that sufficiently answer your question?