It is a very busy department, obviously, in all areas but particularly in this area, with subsection 15(1) likely applying to a lot of things that happen in the Department of Foreign Affairs. But the Information Commissioner has a complaint, and they will rule on those complaints.
I don't want to talk to you about this specific complaint, but I'm sure there have been other complaints that have happened. What happens? With the Information Commissioner, the process—and I think appropriately set up—is that a third party comes in and looks at all the information that has been available, has been provided, what's been blacked out, what hasn't, and where we've gone wrong. We have a letter here saying it may have been a bit slow but you did the right thing, that the department wasn't trying to do anything to stop that information. It was a bit slow, but they've resolved that issue.
What do you do? Do you as a director look at what happens and what the Information Commissioner may report on? What happens to that information? Do you try to implement that? Do you have any history of what happens with that information once the Information Commissioner rules on something?