Going to the censoring, you say that using subsection 15(1), if it was “injurious to the conduct of international affairs”, seems to be the most frequent justification for stamping out, for most of the blacking out.
How is it that all references to torture in 2002, 2003, and 2004 seem to be freely circulated information that was not injurious to the conduct of international affairs, but in the 2006 and 2007 reports, all references to torture are blacked out?
When did that policy shift occur? Why would the administration of that particular exemption have changed so dramatically with a change of government?