I think the reason for doing it in the first place has to do with the enormous overlap of process that occurs between the two. First of all, there are people who are public office holders and members of the House of Commons, or in one case the Senate. On the process for dealing with the codes, although the codes are slightly different, it seemed to us that we'd get much more synergy if we had a single group working on this so they could learn from each other. People would be able to deal with both sides of the operation--public office holders and members of the House. We thought it would be a better human resource, both training and option, relative to efficiency and relative to how we could use information in a way that would serve all these ends at the same time.
It is possible that the fusion will enable us to make some savings. We'll have to wait and see whether that will turn out to be the case. Certainly if we can, it will be better. There's no doubt about that. But it remains to be seen. We're trying in a number of ways to sort of flatten the structure of the office, so as to empower more people inside the office to do as much of the work as possible in any particular case.
So that's the thinking we had. It was a result of the review we had done by the external operation review people. That is what they suggested, and that's the direction we're moving in. We've begun to do it to a modest extent, and we're finding it very useful as a way of having better employees and more efficient employees.