I'd like to quickly ask one last question. I'm running out of time. I would like to try to reframe the question I asked in the first round.
PCO tells the government that the case before us was effectively government officials drawing inferences, making assumptions, and not deliberately circulating the name of a requester of information. Putting that case aside, hypothetically, if officials make such an assumption, if they make an inference about who the requester of information is and pass that along, but it's not actually a breach, would that constitute a breach of the law? They're not actually carrying the name forward from the application. They're just looking at a pattern. This is an issue that somebody has consistently requested on; therefore, they assume this is the requester.
Would that constitute, in your judgment, a breach of the law?