Perhaps I'll go forward another way.
We had a progression from 1999 when there was this issue with the Department of Defence, as I gather, the minister's office, as well as the issue with Mr. Rowat. There was obviously some confusion before that time, because Treasury Board guidelines at that point were issued and people were regularly given knowledge of it and, I gather, dealt with if since then it had been infringed or it was found out that it was infringed.
I'm just trying to get a sense, and maybe Mr. Leadbeater can answer, of the frequency of this and the division between simply the circulation of information, which you've described as not being in violation of either act, and the actual identification of people.