Just for the record, the Privacy Act is clear in the sense that the revelation of a requester can only be disclosed, in the context of the act—and I can't remember the section, I'm sorry—expressly for the same purpose for which it was collected or a purpose that's consistent with that purpose. We heard very clearly in our last meeting that in fact there is a scope within which that name can be used, within the context, within the department. That was very clear to me. However, it's only when the revelation of that requester goes beyond that scope that in fact the Privacy Act has been breached.
On October 4th, 2006. See this statement in context.