We've seen that term, “amber lighting”, in the press, but it's not one that we use, from a policy centre, whatsoever.
What does happen, in dealings with the Information Commissioner...and I think in the Information Commissioner's, or deputy's, testimony in various spots, it's been made very clear that at the same time as an information request is going forward, if there are communications issues involved with this particular information request, we will involve our communications organization within an individual department. We do this because we see under the legislation not only the right of Canadians to receive the information but also the duty of government to inform in terms of the whole context that is there.
So at the same time as there would be an access to information request being processed, there would likely be, in some cases, some information or communications materials being prepared that would be ready to go forward. I'd really like to emphasize, though, that those are going on in parallel. The ATIP coordinator is the one who's responsible for upholding the timelines, the release, and so on. The fact that there is communications material being prepared in parallel is not something that is ever supposed to be slowing down the release of that information under the legislation.