I don't know the details, really, beyond what you've read out there, and now that you read the e-mail.... I didn't remember who had actually sent it, but I actually did see a copy of that e-mail.
What does happen, if I can speak to the generalities around it, is that there are a limited number of journalists who write on fairly predictable subjects time after time. And so you know that this journalist writes on these particular things, whether it be pandemic issues, general public service management issues, whatever, and that there are a number of journalists who work in that area.
There also is—and I guess this is what happens—an awareness that, yes, access to information requests come in, articles then get generated one, two, or three weeks later, or whatever, sometimes referring to access to information, and in that context there are individuals who make the supposition that an individual ATIP request that's in, on looking at pandemic or something, may actually be Fred again, who always seems to write on this. So there is that supposition that happens. In any particular case, and I assume the investigation probably will get down to it, is the linkage of the name with a request, which I'll call general knowledge--that Bronskill writes on this; Kathryn May writes on this, and so on--the nature of the linkage, or was there something else that was released there?