Okay, there are two points. The report was in the words of the motion that was passed. That is what the motion said, and that's how it was presented in the House.
If it turns out that there is some technical difficulty, then no doubt we'll find out what that technical difficulty is. I can bring it back to the committee and just let you know what the rules are. If the committee's view is that we should pass a second report, embellishing on the first or changing the wording, and if that is the view of the majority of the committee, then the committee will speak accordingly.
As far as actually presenting the report goes, it was done properly.
We have two of the three witnesses here. Are we waiting for a third, gentlemen, or are we ready to go?