Yes, it does raise an interesting question, colleagues, about whether or not scheduled work of the committee is going to be pre-empted by these motions. Quite frankly, in my experience, committees try to accommodate motions that have just come before the committee and to make reasonable accommodation, but not to suspend committee business in the middle of it, etc. It's a practice that changes from committee to committee. But we do have the right to seek unanimous consent to waive the notice period if there is a matter that all honourable members would like to deal with immediately and suspend all other business. So we have full latitude, and I think everyone is well aware of the tools we have to work with. There doesn't seem to have been difficulty in the first session, but we can always reconsider if necessary. Okay?
Having said that, Mr. Hiebert has an amendment that says that the period of notice shall be calculated from the time the motion has been distributed to the members of the committee by the clerk.
Is that correct?