Let me address both questions.
First of all, the letters to Schreiber and Moores were sent as a matter of logic and as a matter of law. The advice I had from the department, with which I agreed, was that the gist of the reason we apologized to Mr. Mulroney was the language used in the letter of request, and if you read that language, you'll see it was conclusory. We're used to language that says it's alleged that someone did something, it's alleged that such and such took place, but this language, while sometimes it says that, goes much further than that. It asserts as a matter of fact that there was criminal activity. That's why an apology was given.