Given that the settlement that our government reached with Mr. Mulroney in 1997 was specifically tied to defamatory statements made about him in regard to the Airbus scandal--and I guess this question has been asked before, but I want to ask it again--would the now-public knowledge that Mr. Mulroney and Mr. Schreiber had a separate consulting agreement, unconnected to Airbus, have given you reason to re-evaluate the file at that time? If so, why?
On February 5th, 2008. See this statement in context.