Colleagues, the bells have now started, so we'll wrap it up now.
I have just one question for you, Mr. Rock. On page 116 of Mr. Mulroney's day one testimony in his examination for discovery, he said, “I had never had any dealings with him”, referring to Mr. Schreiber. Of course some other details have now come out in these hearings. But on November 10, I believe, of last year, he had an interview with The Globe and Mail in which he admitted to receiving the three payments totalling $225,000 or $300,000. That is a direct contradiction to his sworn testimony in discovery that he made in a public pronouncement.
Is there any recourse to reopen the settlement, based on the fact that he voluntarily disclosed that he in fact did have business dealings when in fact at discovery he said he did not?