You are his main spokesperson, you made statements that other committee members reported today, you mentioned three payments of $100,000, you have an explanation for that—we were all convinced that you would have one when you came here: a communications expert such as you wouldn't come here to discuss so flagrant a contradiction in public without having a good explanation—we all expected that, but I did not really expect that you would come here today to tell us under oath that, between the spring of 2000 and the fall of 2007, you never spoke about that amount with your client, who is no more or less than a former prime minister of Canada.
On February 7th, 2008. See this statement in context.