Evidence of meeting #15 for Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics in the 39th Parliament, 2nd session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was schreiber.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Marc Lalonde  As an Individual
Greg Alford  As an Individual
Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Richard Rumas
Fred Doucet  As an Individual

5:40 p.m.

As an Individual

Fred Doucet

That was the meeting in Mirabel. The only other time I was present was at the Pierre Hotel, where there was a report on what was being done.

David Tilson Conservative Dufferin—Caledon, ON

Mr. Schreiber was quite happy with that report?

5:40 p.m.

As an Individual

Fred Doucet

Yes, he demonstrated nothing but appreciation.

Mr. Tilson, you have this in front of you. In this, I attempt to reconstruct what both Mr. Mulroney and Mr. Schreiber had told me the mandate was, so I faithfully attempted to reconstruct that, leaving blanks as to the mandating companies and leaving a blank as to the amount that was paid for the retainer.

5:40 p.m.

Conservative

David Tilson Conservative Dufferin—Caledon, ON

There's handwriting on here. It's quite a masterpiece.

5:40 p.m.

As an Individual

Fred Doucet

Yes. May I try to--

5:40 p.m.

Conservative

David Tilson Conservative Dufferin—Caledon, ON

You did discuss it somewhat.

I'd like to know what is referenced to Mr. Schreiber.

5:40 p.m.

As an Individual

Fred Doucet

Okay. If you have the document in front of you, this “Bayerische Bitumen Chemie” is in Mr. Schreiber's handwriting, and then there's “Chemie” written bigger to the right.

5:40 p.m.

Conservative

David Tilson Conservative Dufferin—Caledon, ON

Yes, I see that.

5:40 p.m.

As an Individual

Fred Doucet

To the right. Then there's the word “Kaufering” below. And then below that there's “Bitucan Calgary”.

These three sentences are all in Mr. Schreiber's handwriting. The rest of it is my handwriting.

5:40 p.m.

Conservative

David Tilson Conservative Dufferin—Caledon, ON

We have a debate about the amounts. I know you've listened to the testimony of Mr. Schreiber and the affidavits. You've read his legal material.

I'd like you to clarify the $250,000 that's written here. What does that mean?

5:40 p.m.

As an Individual

Fred Doucet

That's the number that Mr. Schreiber told me had been the fee for services and expenses for the assignment.

5:40 p.m.

Conservative

David Tilson Conservative Dufferin—Caledon, ON

Okay. I know you've answered this, but I want to be clear. You said that the money, which was in an envelope--and that's really all you know, and in fact you may not even know what was in the envelope. It could have been a letter, for all you know.

5:40 p.m.

As an Individual

Fred Doucet

No, that's not quite true, because he made the statement. Schreiber said, “included your expenses and fees”.

5:40 p.m.

Conservative

David Tilson Conservative Dufferin—Caledon, ON

So it included fees and services.

5:40 p.m.

As an Individual

Fred Doucet

Fees and expenses.

5:40 p.m.

Conservative

David Tilson Conservative Dufferin—Caledon, ON

Fees and expenses.

I know I'm asking you questions that you've already answered, but I just want to be clear again as to what the services were that Mr. Mulroney was to perform.

5:40 p.m.

As an Individual

Fred Doucet

Well, these are the ones that are listed in this mandate letter.

I just draw to your attention that when I presented this to Mr. Schreiber on February 4, 2000, I asked him essentially to fill in the blanks, and he did. He didn't say, “No good”; he didn't write across it. He participated in the discussions, as you see by his own handwriting, and I recount here to the far bottom right a summary of what our discussions were about, and these discussions had to do with filling in the blanks. At the end, I said to Mr. Schreiber, “Now, this is what I've taken down. Do you agree with that?” “Of course, of course.”

That's how the meeting ended, and he left with his own copy of this, albeit without my notes or his handwriting. But since he was the author of what's in here, I presume he was comfortable with what he knew.

5:40 p.m.

Conservative

David Tilson Conservative Dufferin—Caledon, ON

Okay. I think you said in your testimony that you first met him in 1988?

5:40 p.m.

As an Individual

Fred Doucet

To the best of my recollection it was.

5:40 p.m.

Conservative

David Tilson Conservative Dufferin—Caledon, ON

Of course, it was a long time ago. And everything was reasonably good.

Somewhere along the line your relationship deteriorated. Can you tell us when it deteriorated and why?

5:40 p.m.

As an Individual

Fred Doucet

To be perfectly frank, it really deteriorated when I heard his testimony--

5:45 p.m.

Conservative

David Tilson Conservative Dufferin—Caledon, ON

You mean here.

5:45 p.m.

As an Individual

Fred Doucet

Yes, in which he made statements about me that were false.

However, to be fully forthcoming here, I must say that post-2000, when I discovered the shenanigans that he was involved in back home in Germany, albeit allegedly, I was kind of happy to take my distance from him, but I had no particular reasons other than what was in the public domain. He has never caused me any harm or anything of the sort, other than what he has testified to here, which has caused me great harm.

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

Okay. Mr. Doucet, you were with Mr. Mulroney and Mr. Schreiber in the Pierre hotel in December 1994?

5:45 p.m.

As an Individual

Fred Doucet

Yes, it was on December 8.