Mr. Chairman, I want to tell Ms. Cameron that not everybody shares the rather skeptical viewpoint that my Conservative Party colleague just expressed on the value of her work. In his recent report, David Johnston tells us that the entire question of the facts surrounding the Airbus affair is well-tilled ground. That's his expression.
To prove that the facts concerning the Airbus affair are public knowledge and to explain why he will exclude them from the mandate of an eventual commission of inquiry, he cites Stevie Cameron's books. So the authority chosen by the Conservatives to establish the so-called frame of reference of an eventual commission of inquiry cites, in footnote 4, the two books by Ms. Cameron and the two books by William Kaplan as evidence that he has for saying that it is unnecessary to examine the Airbus affair. That's quite surprising, and I wanted to share that information with my colleague Mr. Hiebert, who clearly has not yet had the opportunity to read Mr. Johnston's report.
Mr. Chairman, I'm putting my question to Ms. Cameron. Is there anything in those books that, in her view, can logically lead to the conclusion that we no longer need to investigate the Airbus-Mulroney-Schreiber affair?