The reason I ask is that, as you've stated, the committee has actually looked at both. We looked at some that got an F and some that got an A. The purpose was to find out the good stories and how they can recommend to the others how to improve their ways. It might even help in preparing for the test you're going to give in the next little while.
My question to you is whether or not it would be appropriate to review the gradings the Information Commission has already given. Presumably there were some last year.