It would be after the first word, “That”. So it would read as follows:
That in order to examine whether there were violations of ethical and code of conduct standards by any office holder, the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics review matters relating to the Mulroney Airbus settlement, including any and all new evidence, testimony, and information not available at the time of settlement and including allegations relating to the Rt. Hon. Brian Mulroney made by Karlheinz Schreiber, and in particular the handling of allegations by the present government, including the circulation of relevant correspondence in the Privy Council Office and Prime Minister's Office; that Karlheinz Schreiber be called to be a witness before the committee without delay; and that the committee report to the House its findings, conclusions, and recommendations thereon.
Mr. Chair, I believe this would further clarify to the public of Canada just how this matter has been handled. We've heard allegations in terms of correspondence being received and affidavits being presented, and I think as parliamentarians we have every right to see the trail those affidavits and correspondence have made, no matter which office holder holds them or where they were disposed of, and in particular what the result was in this particular case.
Thank you, Mr. Chair.