No, my point of order is to suggest that in the last meeting you were entertaining arguments as to why they should be admissible--any of those motions. We have not heard those arguments as to why they should be admissible.
I heard you suggest why you feel they may be admissible, or why you feel they are admissible. My feeling is that they are not admissible under the Standing Orders that have been established.
This committee was established with very tight parameters as to what it is to be working on. This committee could be doing some very good work. I don't believe it's in the interest of Parliament and I don't believe it's in the interest of Canadians that this committee chase off on a witch hunt. I suggest, if I may, that if the committee is to entertain these motions, it needs to do so via a reference from the House of Commons.