I want you to rule on this first, and then I'll talk to it.
Since the mover of the original motion has accepted it as a change, does that not make it then the motion and not an amendment to the motion?
On November 22nd, 2007. See this statement in context.
November 22nd, 2007 / 11:30 a.m.
Conservative
Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON
I want you to rule on this first, and then I'll talk to it.
Since the mover of the original motion has accepted it as a change, does that not make it then the motion and not an amendment to the motion?
See context to find out what was said next.