I fundamentally disagree with the Bloc approach on this. We've set up a process of having the steering committee look at the priorities. If Madame Lavallée's motion said this was a priority or we should look at it immediately, that would change the motion.
Her amendment is irrelevant because it doesn't have any effect on the motion itself. Saying “some time” or “eventually”--that's what all motions are until the steering committee reports back here and we decide. That is why I'm not voting for it.
I don't know how the chair can even rule it in order. It's not even in order. But if it passes it will have no effect on how things are going to be done here in this committee. If they want amendments in English to have relevance, they have to have a purpose, and this one doesn't have a purpose.