Order, order. Please, the chair just wants to consult here for a second.
The committee has just passed a motion by Mr. Asselin, as amended by Mr. Thibault, that a preliminary list of witnesses in this matter be submitted by Thursday, November 29. That was adopted by the committee.
Mr. Hiebert now has made a motion that we hear Dr. Johnston as the first witness, which is basically pre-empting the committee's deliberation on the order in which.... So as long as members understand, it is in order. The motion is in order, but it is contradictory to a question that the committee has already adopted. So Mr. Hiebert has moved that Dr. Johnston be the first witness to appear.
Did you specify a date, Mr. Hiebert, or just the first?