Actually, it's a good segue, because we are going to talk about the Privacy Act and some expansion. We'll also be looking at the capacity problem. You can make all the changes you want to the Privacy Act, but if you don't have the human resources to deliver, we may have our priorities a little askew. So human resources will be relevant to the rest of this.
I think the members have received the document, the proposed media changes. We had indicated that this was a document we wanted to build on. That doesn't mean we won't be able to add anything. I have read it, as you probably have as well, and my assessment is that there are three or four—maybe even five—items that are pretty straight-forward, pretty no-brainer. We won't need a lot of witnesses to corroborate it.
I am suggesting, Madam Commissioner, that we don't have much time. I think the members have read this, have reviewed the document properly. I believe that we should try to go quickly through the ten, spending very little time on the straight-forward ones, particularly those that are mirroring existing legislation in, say, PIPEDA or provincial law. I think they're self-evident.
For the balance of the session, we would like to identify some of the areas where we may need expert witnesses. Questions may very well come up as we move towards reshaping the Privacy Act, at least to the extent that we've covered it in this report. I don't think we want a major presentation, but it would be helpful if you could walk us through. I want to get to the questions of the members first. That's the important thing for us. So we would ask that you go through and suggest which ones really need attention, placing a little less emphasis on those that speak for themselves.
Would that be okay?