I have one other question, then. It has to do with recommending the order-making powers that you suggested for the commissioner. I think the commissioner has in the past agreed with that. She said she wants that. The former Information Commissioner, Mr. Reid, said he didn't want that.
We start looking at powers, and you mentioned the nervousness about giving the police too much power. Now we're saying, on the other hand, let's give the commissioner more powers, which I assume are quasi-judicial powers. I don't know what that means. That's like setting up a separate board. It would cost a whole whack of money. Does that mean the courts wouldn't be involved? She would make an order and that's that, without any reference to appeal?
We've talked about this issue in different areas. I did find interesting your comment that you didn't want to give the police more powers but that you want to give the commissioner more powers.