Obviously, then, one looks at mediation. We look at investigation. We look at investigators trying to talk and people making inquiries. Maybe there is some other way of doing things, whatever the mediation process is. That's all fine and good.
The commissioner educates the public; the commissioner educates us. The commissioner advises Parliament, advises us, advises members of the public, has education programs, provides lectures across the country, sets up a website, makes investigations. And there are probably other things I can't think of.
So the question I'm getting at is if she gets order-making powers, will she have some sort of conflict? I'm not talking about mediation; I'm talking about someone who would actually hear the evidence and make orders. That person would have to have a fair bit of academic training and perhaps some legal training. We're setting up a quasi-judicial board. My question is whether there would be some sort of conflict.