Yes, yes, there are different obligations.
There was a wonderful cartoon last weekend in a national newspaper. In the cartoon somebody opens the door to “Audits”; the answer is, “I'm not interested”.
Obviously there are obligations and duties of government that have to be carried out. Sometimes information is collected about us coercively. But the Supreme Court of Canada said recently, “Thank you very much, but you can only use sniffer dogs at Greyhound terminals and schools under certain circumstances, where there's reasonable cause.” It may very well be that crossing the border, somebody will....
I was once stopped going to England because I smiled at somebody--last time I smiled at one of these characters. They harassed me. And I'm such an innocent abroad.
The argument I want to make to you is that if you've had such a high privacy standard for the private sector, which you have done in PIPEDA--and in Alberta and British Columbia with PIPA, and with the Quebec legislation--why do you think you'd let the government off the hook? It's not that we want the government to stop doing what a government should be doing, but they have to follow the rules of the road with respect to collection, use, disclosure, security, destruction, retention, records management.