There is such a delicate balance we're trying to achieve here for the committee about private information and also for the need of protection. But I'm still trying to understand. If the privacy impact assessments are running the way they are, and you feel it's suitable, why, then, are you against legislating it? Is it because it provides you with a certain amount of flexibility with that? You would like to have that flexibility, and legislation might impede that?
On May 13th, 2008. See this statement in context.