I don't think so. I didn't think we'd be talking copyright, although I'd be happy to do so. I got into a lengthy debate with your colleague Gord Brown, talking about some of those specific issues.
I actually think there is a consistency, both with the concern for appropriate protections of privacy and with concerns about where copyright legislation may go. A good example of that is the prospect that some technologies--to come back to the question about different kinds of technologies--can be used not only to lock down certain kinds of content but also to extract personal information without the knowledge of a particular individual.
We've had that in one case, the Sony rootkit case, in which hundreds of thousands of Canadians found themselves subject to both a security breach and fears that their personal information would be sucked out and sent, essentially, to the mother ship without their knowledge. One of the concerns is that to effectively provide appropriate protection, you have to provide someone with the ability to circumvent, to ensure that they can indeed protect their personal information.
So when I come before you to argue about the essential need for a strong privacy culture, both within the Privacy Act as well as, frankly, within PIPEDA, I think that's wholly consistent with calling for a copyright act that reflects a fair balance between the interests of users and creators.
I'd be happy to talk about that offline.